Boundary Enforcement with Layered Architecture: Preventing LLM Spaghetti Code

James Phoenix
James Phoenix

Summary

LLMs create spaghetti architectures by violating layer boundaries—routes accessing databases directly, domain logic mixed with infrastructure. ESLint boundary rules automatically enforce layered architecture (presentation → application → domain → infrastructure), catching violations at lint-time and guiding LLMs to respect architectural patterns through immediate feedback.

The Problem

Without enforced boundaries, LLMs leak code between architectural layers—presentation accessing infrastructure directly, domain logic depending on external APIs, business rules scattered across layers. This creates unmaintainable spaghetti code that’s hard to test, debug, and refactor. Traditional code reviews catch this too late; LLMs need real-time feedback during generation.

Udemy Bestseller

Learn Prompt Engineering

My O'Reilly book adapted for hands-on learning. Build production-ready prompts with practical exercises.

4.5/5 rating
306,000+ learners
View Course

The Solution

Use ESLint boundary rules (eslint-plugin-boundaries) to automatically enforce layered architecture constraints. Define clear layers (presentation, application, domain, infrastructure) with explicit dependency rules (presentation can use application/domain, application can use domain, domain depends on nothing). Linting fails immediately when LLM violates boundaries, forcing correction and teaching proper architecture through rapid feedback loops.

Related Concepts

References

Topics
Architecture PatternsBoundary EnforcementClean ArchitectureDddDependency ManagementDomain Driven DesignEslintLayered ArchitectureLlm ConstraintsQuality Gates

More Insights

Cover Image for Thought Leaders

Thought Leaders

People to follow for compound engineering, context engineering, and AI agent development.

James Phoenix
James Phoenix
Cover Image for Systems Thinking & Observability

Systems Thinking & Observability

Software should be treated as a measurable dynamical system, not as a collection of features.

James Phoenix
James Phoenix